Blog

Nevada Supreme Court Rules That Implied Consent Law Is Unconstitutional

Posted by Sam Sliger | Oct 22, 2014 | 0 Comments

NEVADA SUPREME COURT RULES THAT IMPLIED CONSENT LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Sam Sliger has argued that the current method for collecting and testing breath and blood from an accused is unconstitutional. On Thursday, October 16, 2014, The Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the state's implied consent law, which permits law enforcement officials to force a driver without a warrant to submit to a blood test to determine whether he or she is impaired, is unconstitutional.

A case called Missouri v. McNeely, was the main case decision the Nevada Court used to rule that the state's law violates the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search.

This decision is monumental and will have a huge effect on how Nevada law enforcement officers handle their DUI cases. Also, this decision will effect how Georgia DUI attorneys argue that the Georgia implied consent law is also unconstitutional.

Nevada's implied consent law does not allow drivers a choice between a test or a penalty. By making this ruling, the high court in Nevada has ruled that Nevada's implied consent law does not allow warrantless searches where the option to revoke consent is not an option. The government always argues that all drivers gave consent to such testing when they applied for and received a driver license. However, this creates a problem because then you cannot revoke that consent and thus it becomes irrevocable. Consent must be voluntary. How can consent be voluntary if you cant revoke it?

This ruling will now bring other issues to light.  For example, now that the court has ruled that the officer cannot get a blood test without a warrant, the officer will just get a warrant. So the next question is: Is getting a search warrant to force a person to allow another person to stick them with a needle and take blood for a misdemeanor charge what we want to allow in society?

For more information, you can always call Sam at McDonald & Cody, LLC (706) 778-5291.

About the Author

Sam Sliger

Sam Sliger is the newest member of McDonald & Cody, LLC. He is proud to be a Graduate from the University of Georgia. Sam is a member of the State Bar of Georgia and a member of the United States District Court.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us 24 Hours

We would be privileged to speak with you further regarding your legal needs.

Our Philosophy

The philosophy at McDonald & Cody, LLC is to provide maximum results, one client at a time. We are dedicated to our cases and strive for quick, full and maximum compensation. We are committed to our core values of returning phone calls, candid assessments, and responsibility. These values are the building blocks to successful relationships with our clients who deserve the very best in legal services.